InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: jaybird249 post# 4181

Tuesday, 07/08/2008 7:04:13 AM

Tuesday, July 08, 2008 7:04:13 AM

Post# of 7284
I'm looking forward to seeing ....

.... some clear and unequivocal numbers up on DOGGR ... but I realize I might have to wait a while and see something definitive in upcoming SEC filings.

Along those lines , I've got a question about which you might have an opinion ....

If the production numbers in TIV's PRs are in fact clear and unequivocal , why are they using the Confidentiality technicality to avoid submitting the numbers to DOGGR?

I think we can rule out one possible answer to that question .... if the PR'd numbers are in fact an accurate representation of sustainable and growing daily production rates , with no uncertainty or doubt about them , that would imply they are not concerned about competing lease-buyers .... unless they think potential competitors aren't reading their PRs.

What other legitimate reason might there be for refraining from showing current and potential shareholders exactly what their oil production was for March , April , May and now June?

In other words , why would they not proclaim these numbers as proudly on DOGGR as they proclaim them in Safe Harbor protected PRs where they have the latitude to use words such as anticipate?

I can't think of a valid reason ... can you?

jonesie

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.