Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[jazzbeerman]

Beanstalk,

re: "it looks like data from 07/02 PR is from 8 week scans only so it was not a progressive update beyond the 1st scan after the initial dose."


Actually it was.


The July 2 PR gave us more than just an 8 week report on each patient.

remember -

July 2:
"100% of Evaluable Patients to Date Continue to Show Objective Tumor Response or Stable Disease"


"100% of Evaluable Patients to Date
Continue to Show Objective Tumor Response or Stable Disease"

In the July 2 PR, since they mention the number of responders and stables was based on patients' 8-week scans, we learned that in the three new patient (8 week) scans, two out of those three were partial responses, and one was stable disease, for a total of seven responses, seven stable, in the 14 patients.

But the other quote, "100% of Evaluable Patients to Date Continue to Show Objective Tumor Response or Stable Disease", tells us that the five earlier classified as responders have been confirmed via additional scans, and any early stable patients are still stable.

King: "with patients now out over four months since the start of the study, none have shown tumor growth or disease progression. "

but-
What I would like to learn now is info on any change in tumor reductions, from scan to scan, in the responders and the stables.
Have the responders continued to see their tumors shrink?
Have the stables gotten closer to the 30% point in tumor reduction to be classified as responders?
Have they stayed the same?

Personally, I expect the bavi 'vaccination effect' to kick in also...



j