InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: BREACHER post# 144972

Thursday, 07/03/2008 11:08:09 AM

Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:08:09 AM

Post# of 326352
We were told that NEOM turned down such an offer.(edited)

Did the company ever state that publicly? Seems like such an offer would have been a significant material event and as such would have required at least a PR, maybe an 8-K , if not a full vote by shareholders , and perhaps even a mention in a quarterly and/or annual filing.

See the below link as an example:

(edited to fix link):

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&cb=1215098229&article=25754053&symbol=N%5ESMTK

Whether or not a several-years-old 'mystery offer' would affect a 2008 sales price or not ... I don't know.

Obviously from the simple math I've done along with some speculation , I am of the opinion that we certainly do 'have to worry' about the total AS. Yorkville is certainly due at least 4B shares (the difference between the AS and the OS) via their Preferred, Warrants, etc. Moreover, that 'fully diluted' section is put in 10Q's or 10K's for a reason. Yorkville will want to be compensated to the maximum possible legal limit ... which is why I have put together several posts illustrating how they could in fact maximize their 'percentage ownership' of NeoMedia through various tactics.

JMO

jonesie



Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"