DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Mike,

So, are you saying that a 'validation' of 2.0 in terms of verifying the ability of the product to differentiate beween African/nonAfrican ancestry would not be applicable to 2.5?

Also, if there are so many 'opportunities' available in this country to verify the accuracy of the product, how was it possible to release 2.0 in it's clearly unfinished state? Were they only focused on the African/nonAfrican aspects?

Can we expect the accuracy issues to be behind us now? Pesumably they learned some significant lessons in terms of accuracy and verification processes during the last go round. Is it reasonable to expect that the product design issues have been resolved as well as the design processes that led to them?

How is it possible to enhance 2.5 in terms of IndoEuropean/NativeAmerican/East Asian without maintaining the accuracy of the African/nonAfrican distinctions? Are the algorithms so entwined that an enhancement in one area must be balanced with a degradation in another?