SBB read the language "unpatentable over Weber"..."Secondly" has to kill Google...Note that after the traversed statement at each Applicant argument, the Patent Office goes on to describe, in detail, how Weber did, in fact, disclose or suggest...
"Firstly, Applicants argue that Weber ('524) does not disclose or suggest constructing a weighted boolean query using the recognition hypotheses...This argument is traversed...
Secondly, Applicants argue that Weber ('524) does not disclose or suggest searching databases for news, stocks, weather, movies, or web pages. This position is traversed...
Thirdly, Applicants argue that Weber ('524) does not disclose or suggest adjusting a ranking of possible matching entries, as claimed in claim 8. This position is traversed...
Finally Applicants argue that Mahajan et al. does not disclose or suggest the limitations...
Therefore, the rejections of claims 1, 2, 8, 10 to 12, and 17 to 19 under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Weber ('524), of clains 3, 4, 9, 13, and 14 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Weber ('524) in view of Mahajan et al., and claims 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Weber ('524) in view of Padmanabhan et al., are proper."
AI
