Hmm, perhaps.
As I said yesterday , or the day before , they most likely do now have a better shot at some decent oil/gas production than they've ever had before.
But even in this PR , there is still wording like this:
"The most recent production test was made to measure facilities capabilities in anticipation of establishing a stable production rate in the 2,000 BOED" (area? range?)
Sounds to me like they are still anticipating having stable production at that rate. It's what they are saying. Clearly.
And once again they raise a question by putting out a PR of this nature ... why exactly keep March , April and May production hidden from shareholder view? (Not to mention non-disclosure of Feb. results until DOGGR hounded them)
Their continuous stream of PRs touting anticipated or temporary flow rates certainly belie any desire for secrecy from competing lease-buyers.
And as their continuous PRs show , they do in fact know very well exactly what their production was for all of those months .... yet they choose to use a reporting technicality which allows them to PR such numbers , within ambiguous language , without actually , dare I say it .... proving them.
JMO
jonesie
Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964
"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"
