Let's try then to concentrate on "value" with respect to the blatantly obvious/stark contrasting numbers: extremely low pps : extremely high revenues.
I break down the revenue dynamics. A straight PSR would ignore the extremely low net margin and in my mind the dollars up top generating earnings down below is obviously affected by the costs in between.
So I used the PSR model that takes Market Cap + Debt / Revenues. For 2007 the PSR was ~.67 but for the trailing 12 months the PSR is ~.24. Had not done the latter math until today. Had originally conceded the mildly undervalued figure would change based on accounting for 1Q 2008 numbers. Taking into account the 1Q numbers I agree, mildly was a bit ignorant lol-- doh!
How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg. Abraham Lincoln
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.