InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: DougS. post# 14283

Wednesday, 05/05/2004 4:14:25 PM

Wednesday, May 05, 2004 4:14:25 PM

Post# of 82595
An observation.


---
"Mike, I agree with some of what you say but not the part about "recent" admixture. It was never pitched as recent."
---

I think by 'recent' Mike is referring to DNAP's original suggestion that certain anomalies discovered in the Ancestry product could be explained by 'recent' contributions made by the 'hidden grandmother', and not by the ancient stuff that was eventually determined to be the explanation.

regards,
frog