So you'd be a bad mod cuz those messages are ok.
First, 30157330 was a reply to a message that said Paul Taylor would be back in the saddle again once Kistler was done renting the shell. The poster said like a boomerang. It's not the most intelligent, but it didn't violate the TOU. Paul Taylor was in control of ADCS from 2005 until November 2007. It's fair commentary.
Second, 30157990 asked another guy who said he was buying at .0002 if he got any. It wasn't an attack. It was talking about the trading of the stock.
Third, 30165150, the poster said the Beast turned into a black hole. Fair criticism of the company. May not have been a great post, but my job isn't to censor people. It's to stop attacks on posters (not the company or officers).
Fourth, 30168046, 30168054, 30158431, and 30168066 and many others mentioning PINR. I note that I restored some posts about PINR today as well. The issue here is Brian Kistler, I.R. for ADCS. His relative is nominee President of ADCS. When Kistler was removed as I.R. of PINR, it became relevant to shareholders of ADCS to know what their IR man is up to, especially since the President is a relative. Some speculation exists that Kistler/Carnes install Kistler as IR and then dilute killing it. Subsequently, they remove Kistler and everyone becomes excited again. This gives the Kistler/Carnes crew a second life. I think that the references in the context and the current event with the control people of this shell are relevant to an investor who is trying to make a decision. If Kistler was given an award for best fiscal I.R. that would be relevant too. So his removal from PINR is on topic. If the posts said, "Let's buy PINR, it's a xxx company with a good xxx," that would not be relevant.
I hope this helps.
