InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1656
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2005

Re: venomen2002 post# 24810

Thursday, 06/19/2008 6:39:40 PM

Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:39:40 PM

Post# of 41740
For starters, I don't agree with SBB's substantive position.

That being said, you are asking him to prove negatives in those situations, where the only PRs information given about those items has come from ONEV, some in PRs, some in SEC filings and some in both. When you state that ALL of those have been proven with "links," none of the links provided for the items listed is from anyone other than ONEV or ONE's IR (or through a poster from said sources) -- the exception being OfficeMax, to the extent that posters, including myself, who have reported INDEPENDENT verification of the ONEV statement.

Okay, now I have an independent verification for the job stuff as well: http://sandiego.craigslist.org/nsd/sof/698818222.html

and

http://www.voipwereld.com/General/Senior-Software-Engineer-San-Diego-20080529.html

Otherwise, there has been no independent link VERIFICATION of points 1, 2, 3 (ongoing being the key there -- MOT has a lot of their own stuff going on; although there likely still is an agreement, it probably is not active -- the way ONEV has dealt with things going inactive is by removing them from the SEC filings: ATT remote; Cingular; Lucent; Tier One), 4, and 5.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.