Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:34:08 AM
1. I am right. Built from scratch it would have to be certified and the production line would have to be also. Why reinvent the wheel?
2. Other companies produce reformers. As an example I include this link...http://www.electricauto.com/
3. There has been random talk of a joint venture.
4. ARSC could go in with a company that already has a reformer as a joint venture. ARSC would supply the technology of Dr. Botte to make the reformer much more efficent.
5. In return,the other company already has their unit CSA certified and maybe production capacity. I would expect that only paper work and inspection would be necessary to get the change added to the certification. I suggest that the long time frame would no longer exist.
6. Frank would be right in saying that they don't need to get the unit certified.
It seems that all questions and arguments would be resolved.
It's just an idea based on conflicting statments and previous arguments about certification. I'm sure there are other possibilities but I suggest this as one.
FEATURED POET Technologies Reports Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results • Aug 15, 2024 8:04 AM
PickleJar Announces Official Name Change and New Ticker Symbol • NREG • Aug 15, 2024 2:23 PM
VAYK's Q2 Profit Added to Accumulated Net Profit of Over $2.2 Million In 18 Months • VAYK • Aug 15, 2024 9:07 AM
Swifty Global Reports Strong Q2 Performance and Prepares for Major Exchange Uplisting • DRCR • Aug 15, 2024 9:04 AM
Mayback's Global Entertainment Signs Global Distribution Agreement with Children's Media Studio • AHRO • Aug 15, 2024 8:45 AM
ATWEC Reaches Profitability, Announces Massive Earnings Growth, and a Strong Forecast for the Rest of 2024 • ATWT • Aug 15, 2024 7:16 AM