InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 479
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/28/2008

Re: TREOTREO post# 6841

Thursday, 06/12/2008 1:16:20 PM

Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:16:20 PM

Post# of 27745
Treotreo, you said:
"without getting too much off topic, AT&T absolutely was suubisiding 1st gen iphone, just go to apple site & lookl at the diff in price between iphone with contract or without.

at&t now raised their minimum plan by $10 a month,minimum contract = 2 years , so at&t gets an extra $240 to recoup their subsidy cost. "

I agree, this is off-topic, but I have to object to your point.

AT&T paid APPLE around $18.00/month for every iPhone v.1 activated. APPL sold the iPhone at a price excluding the contract that was higher for sure, or you could get a "discount" by activating via AT&T.

Granted the end result in terms of cost over contract to the consumer is pretty much the same, but now AT&T will NOT pay apple the monthly charge- however, rules have been tightened to ensure v2 iPhones must be activated via AT&T. If the customer cancels the contract he's charged the AT&T subsidy of $200.

V1- AT&T pays APPLE for the privilege of exclusivity
V2- AT&T pays the customer to induce the contract

Pretty much works out the same in the wash, but still represents different concepts.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.