Mastaflash, that's not true at all. We, I, have acknowledged others. In fact, if you check out HSM, we found that Ben Stanley is at it again. A few folks called the new "company" to complain.
The issue is, Rufus is the ONLY one spreading lies. Rufus is the ONLY one that has the authority to get representation for the company. Rufus is the ONLY one to clear up for the SEC why there's even a question of who's the CEO. Rufus is the ONLY one that can provide proof of assets for this case. Rufus is the ONLY one that can name defendents in a separate case to expose any other crooks. Rufus is the ONLY one that can name a defendent in a separate case for the NSS conspiracy.
Therefore, Rufus is the ONLY one that is holding the case back, the PPS down, and a target for fraud by the SEC and many so-called bashers.
I hope that clears it up some. Some of the faithful need to learn what the present case is about. It's about fraudulent PR's and filings signed and submitted by Rufus during the months of September and October of 2006. The present case has NOTHING to do with any ch5 conspiracy theories. Rufus would have to open a separate case to appease many on ch5. It's just that many on ch5 aren't smart enough to figure that out yet.
