InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 368
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2008

Re: investor911 post# 7264

Tuesday, 06/03/2008 10:12:24 AM

Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:12:24 AM

Post# of 100433
investor911, please take a look at the "Potential Anti-Takeover Effect" section. It appears to indicate that by implementing the reverse split that management is not looking to impede "the ability of third parties to take over or change the control of Syntroleum."

"Potential Anti-Takeover Effect
If the Reverse Split is implemented by our board, there will be an increase in the number of authorized but unissued shares because the number of issued and outstanding shares will be reduced by the Reverse Split while the number of authorized shares is not being reduced by the Reverse Split. This could, under certain circumstances, have an anti-takeover effect (for example, by permitting issuances of our common stock that would dilute the stock ownership of a person seeking to effect a change in the composition of our board or contemplating a tender offer or other transaction for the combination of Syntroleum with another entity). The Reverse Split proposal is not being proposed in response to any effort of which we are aware to accumulate shares of our common stock or to obtain control of us, nor is it part of a plan by management to recommend to our board and stockholders a series of amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect or deter a change in control. Other than the Reverse Split proposal, our board does not currently contemplate recommending the adoption of any other amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation that could be construed as affecting the ability of third parties to take over or change the control of Syntroleum."


"Opportunities are best viewed through the eyes of a tiger"