InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 522
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2003

Re: alan81 post# 33274

Thursday, 04/29/2004 11:38:17 AM

Thursday, April 29, 2004 11:38:17 AM

Post# of 97595
They were "A" step devices and operated at 2.8 Ghz

Thanks for the data point. I guess my theory of them pushing the transistors is flawed unless they did it from the start. This may indicate 90nm does have some issues in general. We'll get a better idea when Dothan arrives.

all the crap (I mean stuff) that Intel threw into the design and is not bringing any value to the customer yet

I still don't buy this theory. They could have statically tied this logic off to be inactive or had it dynamically disabled. I guess the transistors for this unused portion of the chip would still leak, but I can't see this accounting for more then 5-10W. Leakage power isn't that bad, yet (or is it?). Even with a 10W spot, Prescott consumes too much power.

HailMary

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News