BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[Kag]

Opportunity Knocking,
Why would a doctor give a RECAF test to someone, to detect early-stage cancer, if there is no treatment available to the doctor to use if the results of the RECAF test indicate the patient has cancer somewhere in their body? Doctors have basic rules of medicine that they follow. Doctors do not order medical tests if there is no treatment available for them to use. It would be unethical and a big waste medical resources and someone's money.

The location of the cancer has to be known in order for the doctor to order the appropriate cancer treatment. Thus, it is logical to me that a early-detection cancer test doesn't have much medical value if the location of the cancerous cells is not also known at the same time. kag