good mathematical attempt. I am 85 years old. The experience of having endured with my last ceo, whom his own exec v.p described as an ego-maniac, is not taught anywhere.
I was hired by the founder of the company, started a new division (to compete with the company's major competitor in another field) Spent 33 years, until separated. Reported to the GM, ceo, brother-in-laws of last ceo, pres. asst, financial v.p.(2), exec v.p. and finally the person of subject. Each stage, very difficult, virtually passed around from pillar to post. There came a time when, under incentives, my earnings were considerable. Eventually, disturbing my friend. I disagree with the premise that one's conduct, attitude or negative personal traits, does not affect the responsibility of a top official from producing results for the shareholders. A mind set of collusion, betrayal, non loyalty to anyone, self appointed mind analyst, using corporate (stockholder's money) for family, be it cars, credit cards, condimuniums, home repairs, personal entertainment, home repairs, etc. and other behaviors which some persons might decribe as immoral and sordid, must have an affect.
Government officals have been discredited for less, lost positions, shamed their families.
The most viscious act of all is go beyond human decency. An officer, separated after 33 years, should not be further punished (the coupe de gras) with threats to vendors and customers who reached out to engage my services, with threats of retalliation, if they continued to employ me. This was sanctioned and motivated by the subject "top gun". WHY was that necessary? I had almost reached the age of 65 and with it went a great deal. I committed no crime, dedicated my life to the business, had about year of vacation time accrued,WHY?
The surviving granddaughter of the founder and daughter of the ceo (prior to our friend's)manipulation to the throne (via the new owners)asked me a couple of years ago, what happened to my father?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
