It's my opinion that people who condone/approve statements like that while they are setting shareholders up to be raped have no general ethical compass – forget a moral one. So, you are correct when you believe a con is adding a little moral tweak to a message in hopes of capturing even more investor $$$$$. Unfortunately, it’s done everyday. The test should always be: are their actions consistent with their words? In the case of KGLJ mgt, answer is: NO!
I say if it looks like dog $hit, smells like dog $hit, …you know the rest.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.