InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/18/2007

Re: None

Friday, 05/16/2008 9:54:36 PM

Friday, May 16, 2008 9:54:36 PM

Post# of 107353
if the consensus of the board is correct regarding the non-inclusion of FT's revs in this Q, i guess we should we then expect DR to issue a reiteration of 2.5 or a higher estimate. i wish we could get a clarification from DR on what went into their projections. i would like to know if, due to their discussions with mgmt, they were counting on acquisition revs when they came up with their last Q projections. if so, and it is just a matter of timing, that should be made clear to the public so that people are not disappointed for no reason. if that is not what went into their projection, then disappointment may be more valid. there have been numerous comments recently regarding the speculation that DR was not including FT revs in its last projection. it would be nice to know whether they are. from what i'm hearing, ddi fell significantly short if DR wasn't counting on some FT revs in the Q. OR, ddi would have significantly outperformed DR's projections even if FT's revs would have been included, but for bad timing. please correct me if i have this wrong. imo, we are in need of some immediate clarification. maybe Steve could help? and btw, in case there is any doubt, i love this company.
MK
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KLNG News