InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,570.64
(
-0.89%
)
US TECH 100
19,045.60
(
-1.32%
)
Dow Jones
40,712.78
(
-0.43%
)
Brent Oil
76.76
(
0.21%
)
Bitcoin
60,603.44
(
0.38%
)
Post# of 7631
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

wunsch

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 123
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/02/2003

wunsch

Re: Bobwins post# 4502

Wednesday, 05/14/2008 1:35:51 PM

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:35:51 PM

Post# of 7631
Re: La CAMERA' payments due to T.Gold on May 1st / 08
CURCURPE $ 350 K
La MILLIONARIA $ 350 K
PICACHO $ 1,000 000
TOTAL $ 1.700 00

The way it is stated, in this latest filing, these payments have to date not been received:
'AS OF APRIL 30 / 08,' LA CAMERA HAS MADE ALL REQUIRED PAYMENTS '....not as it would have on May 1st otherwise
The report was issued and signed on May 9,08 . Inference to April 30 implies only up to that date payments had been delivered from all the above mentioned three contracts.
So Tara Gold can, at this point, not count in this unrealized revenue.
If these funds had been received they wouild be recorded as received on that May 1 contract date.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up