![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, April 23, 2004 12:03:47 PM
I find it interesting that in my read of the stories the legal question was about how the DNA material was acquired from Lee and had nothing to do with the assistance DNAP provided in classifying the ancestral background of the suspect from DNA left with the victims. This doesn't remove DNA Witness from the "legal woods" yet, but the focus in those stories was on how a test sample was collected from Lee. I would guess our day in court will be coming as Mr. Lee's attorney utilizes addittional legal arguments (grasps at straws) to protect his clients rights. It is refreshing that the judge at the hearing wasn't buying the attorney's argument, but I hope he won't be reversed. It would be a shame to see a multiple murder let off by a technical argument undercutting all the other evidence in the case.
Long and strong.
Stakkdek. >Happy Friday!<
PS: thanks to all for the continued great contributions.
Simple Stock Loans Announces Unique Solutions For Investors Looking for Alternative Liquidity Amidst Recent Small Cap Rally Sep 6, 2024 9:30 AM
Reliant Coffee Debuts at #271 on the Inc. 5000 List of Fastest Growing Companies - Coffee Service Industry Disruptor Brews Up Exponential Growth Sep 5, 2024 11:51 AM
VAYK Confirms Receiving Revenue from First Airbnb Property with 1.4 Million Annual Revenue Goal • VAYK • Sep 4, 2024 9:34 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Expands Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: New Lens Intercepts 21.75 m at 5.25 g/t Gold & 515 ppm Cobalt • MFL • Sep 4, 2024 9:02 AM
Integrated Ventures Acquires 51% Stake In GetTrim.Com (TM), Telemedicine Platform With Focus On Expansion Into Booming GLP-1 Powered Weight Loss Market • INTV • Sep 4, 2024 8:45 AM
Avant Technologies Announces Strategic Review Process Intended to Maximize Shareholder Value • AVAI • Sep 4, 2024 8:00 AM