InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,728.80
(
0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,528.00
(
0.90%
)
Dow Jones
42,052.19
(
0.69%
)
Brent Oil
72.91
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
69,500.26
(
0.03%
)
Post# of 169279
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Investorman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 48
Posts 18920
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2001

Investorman

Member Level

Re: mastaflash post# 157426

Monday, 05/12/2008 7:39:16 PM

Monday, May 12, 2008 7:39:16 PM

Post# of 169279
There is a difference between a post that attacks the CEO and one that attacks another poster. The first is permissible because it relates to the company and the stock, the second violates the TOU.

Especially when the CEO is a alcoholic con man who dispenses lies like RPH.

Someone who does not agree with you is not necessarily a nefarious person.

Someone who had the shareholders best interests at heart would tell them to stay far away from anything RPH was involved in.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up