InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/07/2008

Re: None

Monday, 05/05/2008 9:20:51 PM

Monday, May 05, 2008 9:20:51 PM

Post# of 154386
Some interesting situations involving shorting (http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2005/03/24/the-naked-truth-on-illegal-shorting.aspx):

Intrigue in the sock drawer
How bad is the problem? Listen to this story: On Feb. 3, a man named Robert Simpson filed a Schedule 13-D with the SEC describing his purchase of 1,158,209 shares of Global Links Corp. (OTCBB: GLKCE), "constituting 100 percent of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Issuer." As described in a story that ran on FinancialWire on March 4, Simpson stuck every single share of the company in his sock drawer -- and then watched as 60 million shares traded hands over the next two days.

In other words, every single outstanding share of the company somehow changed hands nearly 60 times in the course of two days, despite the fact that the company's entire float was located in Simpson's sock drawer. In fact, even as recently as last Friday, 930,872 shares of Global Links still traded hands. If Simpson's claim that he owns all shares is accurate, that is a staggering number of phantom shares being traded around by naked short sellers.

What we have here is a failure to settle
This is just one extreme example of a phenomenon a number of companies have complained about. Patrick Byrne, CEO of Rule Breakers recommendation Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK), for instance, has noted seeing four and five times his company's float rack up in trading volume over the course of a day. Overstock has been on the Nasdaq Threshold Security List for weeks, indicating a consistent pattern of, um, settlement failure.

More info.:http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2005/03/24/the-naked-truth-on-illegal-shorting.aspx