InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 160
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2000

Re: None

Wednesday, 12/20/2000 3:02:12 PM

Wednesday, December 20, 2000 3:02:12 PM

Post# of 15369
I think the communications posted on the Seaview site are too dated to have much impact in offsetting the crA@P report. Showing us some old communications that can be challenged as not representative of the current relationship is not going to settle anything. We need something current and independently verifiable in the areas of GSA, mass-production, AMEX, and sales contracts.

To really put this thing to bed McBride needs to rally some support from his teaming partners and/or consultants such as NTMI, Logis-tech, SL&K, and Kbyte. They don't need to reveal anything sensitive. (Why is it now more sensitive than when it was presented to us in the original PR's?) Just some kind of public statement that they are working with SeaView in achieving their common goals. I don't think that is asking too much.

If these partners are no longer working with SeaView, McBride needs to say so and present what he is currently doing, which should be verifiable by the other parties involved.

This needs to be brought to a definitive and quick end. I really hate to see the company and its CEO wasting time defending itself like this. So bring it to an end and let's get on to making this company successful.