Sunday, May 04, 2008 2:05:54 PM
Quite a conversation, very revealing. Thanks for the post.
IMO also, AIM is the one. I have a couple of concerns though. A quick time frame would mean a lower stock price for the IPO, meaning a larger number of shares for the institutions involved. I am all for growing the company, but I don't want additional shares issued before we at least test Kina, and it would be better after the full 10 well program is executed. Right now our shares are extremely undervalued in my mind, and any dilution at values under several dollars a share will come directly out of current investors pockets.
Buying producing properties with shares may make us look a little better on paper(cash flow, PE, etc), but it is hard to believe that the shares is our current assets in the JDZ would produce assets of anywhere near the equivalent value in a producing asset. ERHC is the JDZ and EEZ assets. Trading our extremely undervalued shares for market valued producing assets is a major mistake. I would be very uncomfortable with a significant IPO before a run up in price.
db
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM