InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 522
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2003

Re: dougSF30 post# 32234

Tuesday, 04/20/2004 1:55:45 PM

Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:55:45 PM

Post# of 97595
You can agree or disagree with his analysis, but this doesn't conflict with his thesis, which is that *margins* will improve

As you pointed out in another post, the memory group margins are not as good as the computation group. I think it is about 30% for the memory group vs. 50% in the computation group (I used incremental earnings to get a ballpark figure here).

Here is a scenario that has flat combined revenue and increased margins for both groups, but also has flat combined profit due to shift of revenue share from computation group to memory group:

 
Q104 Q204
CPU Revenue $571M $521M down $50M
CPU Profit $67M $47M down $20M using GM of %60
Mem Revenue $628M $678M up $50M
Mem Profit $14M $34M up $20M using GM of %40
Tot Revenue $1199M $1199M
Tot Profit $81M $81M



Now you could argue that they are saying overall margin would be up, and not just the individual group margins. In that case, yes, flat revenue would lead to increased profits. To get overall margins to go up in a quarter when revenue share is shifting from CPU to memory would require a very large margin improvement in the memory group, which is maybe not out of the question given that memory pricing in improving and they have greatly reduced production costs.

Having said all that, I do believe they are sandbagging, but I don't think we'll see much more than $.15/share in Q2. I would love to be wrong and have it be $.25/share.

HailMary

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News