InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,868.55
(
-0.22%
)
US TECH 100
20,469.04
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,392.27
(
-0.36%
)
Brent Oil
76.09
(
0.30%
)
Bitcoin
96,900.82
(
0.00%
)
Post# of 93831
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

overdue

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 1
Posts 94
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2003

overdue

Re: lickily post# 62441

Tuesday, 04/20/2004 1:02:30 PM

Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:02:30 PM

Post# of 93831
lickly- I'm not sure what that means but if they are really talking about patent infringement then I agree, up to $2.5MM in damages seem like peanuts -especially when $890M was for non performance on supposedly firm contracts. I don't know, it just doesn't sound like a patent infringement issue to me.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up