InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 145
Posts 6227
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2007

Re: montereyguy35 post# 6180

Thursday, 04/24/2008 10:13:13 AM

Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:13:13 AM

Post# of 6377
Regarding LLBT being featured on www.Stockbully.com

I didn’t see the alleged fine print you stated about the SEC –lady giving her “untrustworthy” references regarding LLBT.

I’ve searched throughout the Stockbully page and links in eagerness to add to the data I’m collecting on this company but didn’t see any reference to your claim (probably due to my being visually dyslexic) ….=)

Please be more specific as to where exactly on stockbully did you see what you say you saw.

***However, I have a more general question.
Why would stockbully risk their own credibility by featuring LLBT if it’s known to (or said to) be some kind of a RIP-OFF stock? (according to it’s track record)

Not to mention the “credible” –damages other pinksheet companies may likely incur by having LLBT listen among them. If I was those start-up companies, I’d be “stock” raving mad!

UNLESS!!! (wishful thinking perhaps), unless there’s more to LLBT than being said or told –OR- perhaps there are changes being planned (or have occurred) that may actually turn things around for LLBT for the better. This CAN (and has) happened before. Who is to say that LLBT (among many others) are exempted from change, in the name of Progress?

Now I can’t steak for others, but common sense IS - “Common Sense” and with that, I believe if I was LLBT and given the track record I have lead which has soured up my image in the stock market (however so pink) so badly, that even after several RS’es and then return (Cloaked)-under a different name PER each (R/S), it will no longer matter. Because the number of pissed off shareholders I’ve accumulated PER-(R/S) is so dayum high that in a short time all their negative chatters (I’ve created for myself) would overwhelm the forums and blogs to badly that new(more recent)-investors would likely pull-out and new “would-be” investors would not Buy-in. Soon I’ll realize it is beginning to cost me more money to process an (R/S) than the invested money I’ve counted on “line my pockets” –OOPS I mean, used for company expense… heh! Typo..

So eventually a bell would go off that perhaps I should do thing more differently! (amazing how “money” can do that)
All the Record-Numbers of PR’s I’ve posted are beginning to sound like Broken records –Literally!
Potential BUYERS, aren’t BUYING-……>8^d………..IT!……..>8^}

Seems like Investors, these days, have gotten a hell of a lot smarter and growing!
They seem to me on to us!
Hell it aint like it was before, we’ll just PR’m, R/S’m and go underground for a few.
Come back cloaked and do it all again! Easy money, Easy profit, who the hell needs products! –LOL!
And about the SEC? Who are they? The Securities and Exchange Commissions? –LOL! Hell I think a more applicable name should have been, Supporters of Exchange Cheaters –LOL! Since they have yet to go after anyone who dose it!

But Now, I have a choice, I can proceed by my current track record and risk acquiring damn-near NO Investor capital regardless of what the hell name I cloak my company under, -OR- I can go the hell-ON and DO what the hell I keep pumping I can DO (but didn’t) and stand to make a likely gain 10-fold the capital growth I have ever gained from all the R/S’s I ever done,, COMBINED!

Although I’ve turned over a new leaf, I have a problem, like the boy who cried wolf, how in hell am I gonna convince investors (both old and new) to believe me this time?






Maintaining TRUTHS requires 'little to no effort' than Maintaining LIES.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.