Well now, Mary, had you bothered to say that in the first place, my response would have been entirely different, if I bothered to respond at all. That omission of material fact caused your original post to be a misleading distortion of the real facts ... probably like most of your stock-related posts, which I don't follow. As for what you consider a "personal attack", I took great pains to explain that I didn't intend for it to be inflammatory, meaning a personal attack. But if that's how you choose to view it, fine. That's a classic example of why you can't get along with anyone.
...Amuck
Fins Up! ~~~/\~~~
...Amuck
