InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 785
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2008

Re: overachiever post# 16446

Sunday, 04/20/2008 3:56:51 PM

Sunday, April 20, 2008 3:56:51 PM

Post# of 49707
I'd second that. I know Exxon funded Stamford's anti-biofuel "study" that Friends of Earth and other very well funded anti-biofuel PR firms cite. I heard they spent 23 million in anti biofuel propaganda altogether. The Stamford study claimed biodiesel increased Nox. They based that on clear cutting a forest, planting rape seed and using the maximum allowed nitrogen fertilizer which was the actual source of Nox. They don't mention the substantial reductions in everything else. This to me shows an agenda and I cannot believe anything else they've said.

Pimentel at Cornell has also been infamous at spinning the numbers out of line with all other accredited work. His work is then cited by every nut trying to feel significant and argue the cause.

I know the economics on biofuels will drive it regardless of the propaganda.