Friday, April 18, 2008 9:33:05 AM
Posted by: Highyield33
In reply to: None Date:4/17/2008 8:06:20 PM
Post #of 20806
Sleep on this tonight. Who do you think the private investors are that is funding EESO? Answer: It is the owners of ESI. This were the money and enzymes are comming from. ESI wanted to go public so they started EESO in conjuction with Jared. Why is the O/S never going to be increased? Answer: These private investor own millions of shares. After ESI / EESO merge and the big million dollar contracts come true this will be worth $1 plus. Now does it make any sense why this is being manipulated so bad now. All of the above is of IMO. Please tell me if I am wrong.
My reply
Posted by: jimstr
In reply to: Highyield33 who wrote msg# 20721 Date:4/18/2008 7:08:17 AM
Post #of 20806
If that was the plan, why didn't they just take ESI public?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMO/FWIW
Jimstr
simple question-got this for an answer (informative but didnt answer my question)
Posted by: oneinamillion
In reply to: jimstr who wrote msg# 20781 Date:4/18/2008 7:17:53 AM
Post #of 20808
Only way to get EESO and ESI together. Jared said I went off on my own to create EESO. He was partners on ESI before hiring a management team to do the daily everyday business in 2004. He then started the new company ESSO by himself without his former partner. I assume Jared still owns his piece of ESI whatever % that was. Not every partnership is 50-50. Maybe the 25% is buying out the other partner, not sure on those details.
and this
Posted by: Doubledown22
In reply to: jimstr who wrote msg# 20785 Date:4/18/2008 8:33:29 AM
Post #of 20806
I love the accusational tone in your question, "like why don't ya'll know the answer to my simple question?" Hell won't you figure it out hoss and let us know instead of acting superior because you asked a question that has been asked here 1,000 times already. To be honest who cares why? I am in concurrence with highyeild and the other 30 posters who have said that we believe ESI and EESO are somehow cut from the same cloth and connected more heavily than being publicly portrayed.
Get off the computer and go to school before you are late for your first class,
Later,
DD22
--------------------------------------------------------------
never inferred that ESI and EESO weren't conected in some way
Now I will ask it again in response to highyields post:
If ESI wanted to go public why would they have to set up EESO to do it??
Theoretical physics can prove an elephant can hang from a cliff with its tail tied to a daisy, but use your eyes -- your common sense ----
please DD before you buy or sell
Jimstr
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM