CHARLOTTE BROWN, ET AL. v. BIRMAN MANAGED CARE, INC., ET AL. Court:TSC
Attorneys:
Kelli L. Thompson, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Birman Managed Care, Inc., Birman & Associates, Inc., Dr. David N. Birman, and Sue D. Birman.
Steve D. Gibson, Ashland City, Tennessee, for the appellee, Charlotte Brown, individually and as custodial parent on behalf of the minor child Christen Barenkamp.
Judge: DROWOTA
First Paragraph:
The plaintiff, individually and on behalf of her daughter, sued her former husband and his employers for fraud and civil conspiracy to defraud. She alleges that these defendants successfully carried out a plan to reduce the amount of her former husband's child support payments. Part of the plaintiff's conspiracy claim is based on the testimony of her former husband in a child support hearing in which he is alleged to have falsely stated his income. The defendants moved for summary judgment on two grounds: (1) the quality of the plaintiff's evidence and (2) the defense of "testimonial privilege," which grants a witness immunity from subsequent civil liability based on testimony he gave in a judicial proceeding. The trial court granted the defendants' motion. The Court of Appeals, in an opinion authored by Judge Cantrell, reversed, holding that the defendants were not entitled to summary judgment and that the former husband's testimony comes within the "larger conspiracy" exception to the testimonial privilege. We affirm both holdings of the Court of Appeals.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.