Is the “SEC” aiding and abetting FRAUD?
I’ve also been following IPKL and if they HAD done what they’ve PR’ed "US" into believing they would do, then they’ll likely be a very profitable investment according to their SEC of the market. (pun intended)..>8^p
BUT, if IPKL had been performing fraudulently while under the watch of the “Securities and Exchange Commission”, (better known as the SEC), then, would the SEC not be an accomplice to this fact? -and therefore be found just as guilty?
When any company continually demonstrates a questionable track record, that has or had or will likely cause monetary damages to investor’s “Security” (i.e.- Money), but yet is allowed to proceed under the wings of the SEC, (directly or indirectly), then perhaps the SEC should be held accountable, in part, -and therefore FINED or SUED for damages THEY'VE ALLOWED to exist under their watch, wings and/or said area of their control.
Perhaps if the SEC is put on trial in the court(s), they’ll likely be less nonchalant about how these pinkies perform. (OR not perform).
Although there are many new companies that are starting out on the pinksheets (in all sincerity) before later being promoted within the main market’s line of sight, there are also many others pinkies that are tarnishing their reputation because they're only in business strictly to “scam” and nothing more!
Who consciously strategize any means necessary to mislead and/or profit from those they've hoodwinked and then "SHELL" or R/S themselves into oblivion before returning (Cloaked) -under another/new name and symbol, with the SEC umbrella'ing them after this act, “knowingly”, without any real recourse of action.
Then give it a few months (years -or when the scammers calculated everyone had forgotten), the said PinkSheet company does it all over again in view of the SEC, who still pass them off as being credible enough to continue practicing, “Further”, under their watch..
Ironically, this Persistent “FLAW” is practiced by the SEC several time a year with “NO ONE” calling them out on it!
Which, in some sense, makes the “Securities and Exchange Commission” a likely accomplice to criminal claim(s) made against PinkSheet companies discovered committing fraudulent business practices, yet alone suspicious of such, by verifiable track record(s)..
One must also ask as to what role the government plays in this act, as they're commected to the SEC who is commected to "Government Currency".
How come there's more governmental "UMPH" pushed behind breaking-up Money Laundering rings, Counterfeiting rings and other mishandlings of governmental currency but seemingly never against the pinksheets companies who are essentially committing the same act(s)?
Perhaps there are more (bigger)pockets being lined than expected.
Just a thought!
>8^p
Dont run with it!
=)
