No it was an honest question. I just ran across it today. I kind of skimmed over the board to see if it had been posted and if it has been I missed it.
When I read the article it amused me how they referred to the change in the Abbott contract as being a possible loss for the company. It's obvious they don't follow it closely or they would have recognized how Abbott was more or less gumming up the works.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.