Keith needs no one to defend him. Keith laid out what the plan would be for hemi. This is much more than other ceos do.
His plan was not for a long term entity, as you know.
Therefore, it is not reasonable to expect Hemi would operate the way an ongoing, indefinitely chartered company would.
To have expectations beyond what has been laid out by the company, and to try to hold Keith accountable for what he has not laid out seems incorrect.
As long he is operating within the long term plan and adjusting to those unforeseen circumstances that arise, investors should be satisfied.
Hemi is not a blue chip, it is not listed, it is not meant to exist indefinitely. To try to apply these standards or to bash hemi for not living up to them seems meaningless to me. Just mho
