InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 16175
Boards Moderated 33
Alias Born 09/30/2000

Re: Chas post# 10966

Monday, 02/18/2002 6:30:44 PM

Monday, February 18, 2002 6:30:44 PM

Post# of 216947
I'll add to that thought Chas....

The name TOP MEMBERS is what in itself creates the confusion.

Two lists are needed and should be implemented. How's this for two better names for the lists?

MOST ADMIRED MEMBERS
LEAST ADMIRED MEMBERS


This would be an even greater service to everyone, existing members, new users and Matt and Bob as well !!

The MOST ADMIRED MEMBERS list would allow Matt to feature members as well as the boards they post on. It would also allow him to monitor online which members are being singled out as LEAST ADMIRED MEMBERS which would help him more thoroughly administer the websites TOU.

For new members, it would be a great quick snapshot as to the so called "quality" issue that the old TOP MEMBERS list wasn't able to distinguish.

Instead of users merely "MEMBERMARKING" someone, all that would be needed would be to change that wording into two possibities. With the following two possible names for members to "MEMBERMARK" in either a positive or negative fashion.....

Mark as HIGH Quality Poster
Mark as LOW Quality Poster


In addition, is it possible that it can be set so that someone has to BE a MEMBER for "X" amount of time before they are allowed to use this suggested feature?

Wouldn't that stop a LOT of the current ability to CHEAT ???

Am I making proper sense to anyone with this thought?





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.