$treet Trader Lion's Den

[Brookwinn]

Repost of Chevy's Comments in reply to my question (from the CCWW board):

That's quite the laundry list you have prepared there! And yes, a handful of us now control a sizable portion of the float, so an uptick perspective can have significant ramifications to our wallets.

Obviously, my thoughts are just that, my thoughts, and having the company provide us their own timeline is going to be far more accurate than my own speculation.

However, I will provide my personal perspective as you have requested:

March
Name/symbol Change
Reverse Split
Cable & Co (Market Research & Group) share restructuring
LHC S8 registration
First acquisition closed
Uplist to OTC.BB

April
LifeHealth spin-off (and all associated activities)
All acquisitions announced to date completed

May
1st 10Q filed, showing implications/benefits of acquisitions (representing Q1CY08)

I'm not qualified to project "other events", such as additional acquisitions, as I have no insight into that possibility. I will also not tender a guess on the uplist to AMEX. Instead, I will simply illustrate my personal feelings.....

IMO, the company has done everything it can do to help promote the pps of this play, and meet the qualifications for AMEX. They have the revenues, the equity, the shareholder base, and the net income requirements. The one thing they cannot control is the pps, which is defined by the shareholders, and their perceived valuation of the company.

I have already posted twice previously what I have calculated to be the true value of the stock, post-split. Both of those calculations easily exceeded the $3 pps minimum typically imposed to be listed on AMEX - I believe one of the calculations showed a potential pps in excess of $4, once on AMEX.

The company has indicated they believe the pps must be at least $1 (post-split) in order for them to file a waiver request to uplist to AMEX. That requires a pre-split pps of $0.007, minimum

Now let's look at this from a shareholder perspective, and why I believe that purchases now, below $0.01, are a good investment:

A pre-split pps of $0.004 creates a post-split pps of $0.60. Increasing the pre-split pps to $0.006 creates a post-split pps of $0.90; in both cases, the difference in pps is a 50% rise in price.

However, which post-split pps would be easier to drive to $1? And with access to institutional investors on AMEX who could easily move the pps to the $3 "normal" price min for AMEX, and a post-split float of less than 2.5M shares, is there any reason to believe that once on AMEX, the pps would not continue to rise?

With as clean a play as this is, with the revenues and equity that the acquisitions provide, then shareholders should not be afraid to place orders at the ASK all they way up to a $0.01 pre-split pps. I see limited risk of loss, and tremendous potential to see a 100% gain even at a pre-split pps of $0.01 ($1.50 post-split). And in doing so, we help the company achieve the one requirement they themselves cannot control. I see that as a win-win for everyone associated with this play, both company and shareholder alike.

JMHO