InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 76351
Next 10
Followers 19
Posts 10888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2002

Re: None

Sunday, 03/16/2008 9:04:28 AM

Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:04:28 AM

Post# of 76351
Fleck: Fed's latest giveaway won't work
By Bill Fleckenstein
Contrarian Chronicles
3/14/2008 11:20 AM ET


The financial system's 'Bailout of the Week' -- $200 billion in loans to securities dealers, with risky mortgage-backed debt as collateral -- is little but stalling for time.

For some time now, the Federal Reserve has been writing a book. It's called "What Not to Do," and on Tuesday it penned a chapter called "The Prudent Bailing Out the Reckless."

That was via the Fed's creation of a $200 billion Term Securities Lending Facility, a pool of money it can lend to securities dealers on top of funds it has already injected into the financial system.

I guess the sight of all those suffering hedge funds and brokers was just too much to bear.

Now, I realize the Fed was created to provide a liquidity backstop in times of emergency. But the Fed has abused its privilege for so long -- by being the creator and proponent of excess liquidity and the problems it causes -- that, in my book, the Fed is nothing short of an abomination. The reality that's eluded Fed "experts" is simple: Credits in much of the financial system are simply no good. And creating liquidity and stalling for time won't make those credits good.

I find it stunning that the Fed is willing to open up its tool kit when faced with liquidity problems -- spawned from bubbles of its own making -- and yet while those bubbles were inflating, the Fed kept it snapped shut tight.

The cheerleader for excess

Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan is responsible for this mess. At every juncture, he insisted on getting out a megaphone and cheering the bubbles. That is why we're in dire straits now.

This action by the Fed will temporarily alleviate some pressure, but it will not change the fundamental problem: Home prices were in a bubble that has now burst. People making median salaries in this country can't afford to buy houses. And even folks who make more money often own more house than they can afford.

The Fed's move set off a big rally on Wall Street, but it lasted just one day. This problem is going to run its course. There's no bubble to bail out the housing bubble.

As to the folks who think commodities may be the next bubble: They might be right.

But exploding commodity prices will not help. They're not going to make housing more affordable because less of people's paychecks will be available for mortgage payments.

Will Fed be left holding the bad?

This just goes to show you the Fed will move heaven and earth to try to keep Wall Street (and, by extension, the economy) running. The Fed cares nothing about capitalism, inflation or the dollar, and it really cares nothing about the message that it sends to the world regarding its aims. Just imagine the image that would be projected if the comrades in power here declared Fannie Mae (FNM, news, msgs) to be a ward of the U.S.

Consider the potential ramifications of the Term Securities Lending Facility, under which the Fed will lend Treasurys for a period of 28 days, taking mortgage-backed debt as collateral.

Before its implementation, the chance of the Fed buying a piece of paper that could deteriorate rapidly over the course of a couple of repo terms would have been small. But now that the Fed, through this facility, is willing to accept (exchange for Treasurys, actually) "AAA-rated" paper -- and remember that the rating agencies are suspect -- it's not inconceivable that the following could occur:

The Fed might actually start taking paper at one price and then find out (by the time XYZ financial institution is supposed to take it back) that the paper is trading at a different price. Inquiring minds would like to know what the Fed would do about these losses if the repo'ing entity was determined not to take back the collateral.

The ball is in Bernanke's court

Creating liquidity and stalling for time won't make those credits good. Credit is contracting all across the financial system, in America as well as around the globe. At the same time, credits are going bad. Both of these problems keep lapping up against each other, and their magnitude will render bailouts useless.

Despite that glaring reality, the Fed remains intent on monetizing whatever needs to be monetized, as Chairman Ben Bernanke thinks this can prevent the underlying mass of home-price issues and the economic consequences of the burst housing bubble from doing what they will do.

But in the end, he's going to shred the currency market and at some point the Treasury market. And, though Greenspan deserves all the blame, Bernanke will likely get it -- with history erroneously declaring him to be the worst Fed chairman ever.

At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein did not own or control shares of any equity mentioned in this column.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/ContrarianChronicles/FedsLatestGiveawayWontWork.aspx

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.