InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 44
Posts 1271
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/07/2007

Re: uranium-pinto-beans post# 17329

Saturday, 03/15/2008 11:51:15 PM

Saturday, March 15, 2008 11:51:15 PM

Post# of 36269
Yes indeed and this could move big at any time with or without those coveted financials. These type of pennies rarely fluctuate because of fundamentals--in fact I think this is why BUNM seems to be ho-hum to many holders and potential investors--they may individuals that base their investment decisions on fundamentals and so they're constantly waiting for some kind of lightning to strike?

As I have stated many times we move on DEMAND as MMs and those on sidelines get greedy and fearful that a tsunami of buyers is on the way. The unexpected PR or the buyout offer from a bigger player with infinitely deep pockets. Some buy as investors and some buy under duress and they risk chasing this. So be it. If you don't feel some compulsion to buy a sub like BUNM and you think you know what a promising penny is then honestly something may be wrong with your deduction.

Also I would like to point out (as in the past) that it's probably a bit unfair to associate BUNM with 'dilution' since the company is actively and transparently building revenue streams. You can cry dilution all day long but maybe focus on the myriad of pennies that blatantly parade in the penny world with no fundamentals, no product, no real world success and clueless management that print shares for a living--yet BUNM doesn't seem to fit that model. Intelligent 'dilution' is called financing an enterprise. It buys TIME, keeps talented people keeping Web sites and servers up and allows us an opportunity to increase a Web reach.

It takes money to make money and I would rather see a company self-finance by selling shares to raise sufficient capital than to fold before it begins or to toxic finance from day one to cover ill-advised overhead costs and losing ventures. Sure it would be nice to see some financial guidance but it's never good enough for most even when it's released and I personally like the investment unknown.

Every new user = $$$$$ just based on advertising, cross-selling, branding value etc. etc. and yet every doubting Thomas wants to see 'financials.' I predict many on the sidelines who are waiting on the latter may be left wanting at much higher levels. You take that risk if you haven't established yourself here already.

The real financials are evident everyday with growth rate of usership--also the chance of buyout increases with each milestone 300K, 400K Momentum is building here and there should be a number of exciting breakthroughs as the co. follows their plan and is judged accordingly.

Finally--let's see and be provided with proof of this 'dilution' by those who claim it every-time the company doesn't run according to their expectations or upon a PR. MM activity and lack of demand over a period of days or buys that are combined by brokerages as 9,000,000 and judged as the company selling shares may be incorrect info or manipulation by bashers, competitors or those wanting in at lower levels. 80,000,000 shares bought and 2 million sold and dropping the bid on the 2 million is more-frequent than some realize. If PPS drops does it mean dilution? If the price stays at .0001-.0002 does that really connote the true value? Thanks for letting me vent