Bronktru…if you’re reading any of this:
Some of the critical observations in your posts:
It looks to me, still, as though an operational success is being hugely manipulated, deliberately postured as a failure and driven into the ground, to make it easier for someone to gather up the smoking pieces of the company after the engineered crash and burn... to get those assets away from the rightful shareholders.
I have been unable to find the Kingslake web page listed "Legal Counsel, Richard Spector, P.L.C." No lawyers by that name doing business in Keller Texas that I could find. Actually, using common lawyer search tools, I was unable to find a lawyer by that name anywhere in the country. Big Problem.
First, the President is not in control of this company, and he has a history of not being in control of the companies he starts…
Sarbanes et al was designed specifically to prevent this sort of claim of ignorance as a defense against corporate officer corruption... and allowing others to run your company for you while you don't know or care what they are doing or how... is a fairly outrageous level of corruption.
Beg the 300 million share question:
Doth the president protest too much? If the assets are truly there & gas demand is strong does anyone on the inside gain when the smoking pieces are gathered up? Not a happy question. Just a question. It's not my intent to pile it on or attempt to bash. The comments in bronktru's posts are well reasoned. I agree with them and thus my prior posts calling for CEO to act.
