Rambus (RMBS)

[Skeptic]

Anyone notice any similarities here:

4/1/04 -- So Ordered: granting [602-1] motion by Infineon

4/1/04 608 ORDER granting [541-1] motion by Infineon to Strike the Industry Royalty rates

denying in part [527-1] motion by Rambus , Inc. to Strike Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Second Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander

the Motion is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to geographic market, except to the extent noted on the record, the

Motion also is DENIED respecting the Pltf's challenge to the portion of the report pertaining to alleged anti-competitive effects absent a showing of market power,

DENIED to the extent the Pltf seeks to submit the supplemental expert report of Dr. William Huber respecting the claim terms First External Clock Signal and Second External Clock Signal

Perhaps all this is trivial - the big pieces are 17200, A/C Privilege, and what the CAFC decides to do, but it is frustrating. I think the worst damage Payne could do now is grant Infineon's second request for a stay pending the FTC appeal.

Skeptic