InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 426
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/21/2002

Re: SmallPops post# 10481

Saturday, 03/27/2004 11:38:58 PM

Saturday, March 27, 2004 11:38:58 PM

Post# of 151757
SmallPops - That data shows Intel had a better improvement than IBM did going to 90nm.

This, of course, pushes the inquiry back one step to ask: what is the purpose of the extra 37M non-cache transitors when going from Northwood to Prescott?

It does seem to confirm what SemiconEng has been saying - there is nothing wrong with Intel's 90nm process.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News