Interesting. I'll watch this just out of curiosity, but I'm immediately struck by the intimation that you're putting together something that'll have real "power" to make changes. It doesn't.
Matt and I pay attention to what's going on and if something's wanted, and we agree that it's a good thing, it's done.
If your new thread proves to be a popular venue for a large number of the site's members to make their thoughts known to Matt and me, then you'll have accomplished something. I think the Q&A thread already accomplishes that, though, and so will some new threads Matt and I have been discussing.
I'm not sure what else you could possibly accomplish. Neither Matt or I have appointed you to speak on behalf of the community or to represent us before the community, and I don't think the community has conferred a similar appointment on you, either. So the intimation that you can somehow force changes to the site is wrong.
I'd no sooner let you walk into my house and start re-arranging the furniture.
Does this have anything to do with it now taking two clicks to find out how many people have you Peoplemarked? <g>
Edit In: This organization will work with the InvestorsHub administration as a group
That's the part of your header that drew my response. This may or may not be a good idea (open to debate), but the statement, as it stands, at this point in time, is patently inaccurate.
We recognize no such "organization" currently and prefer, instead, the more open, free-style method of just whining at us in public or PM. And I can't help but somehow resent your taking it upon yourself to declare the existence of such an "organization" and the insinuation that Matt and I are unresponsive to the community but will be responsive to your organization.
