goin fishn,
The key is to think in terms of the network and the formation of the trust matrix. That's the end game.
A few things:
1. Wave makes everything work together:
Infineon's software works for Infineon's chip.
Intel's vPro solution works for Intel's CPU and chipsets.
Wave's software helps support Infineon's chip, and ST Micro's, Broadcom's, Atmel's and Winbond's chips, Intel's vPro and iTPM architecture, Seagate's hard drive and hybrid hard drive and TPM architecture, Dell's biometric platform and Gemalto's integrated smart card readers in Dell machines. So if you want to apply a single client-side trust environment for enterprise PC users, both on their legacy units and their new ones, there's only one solution you can use.
2. Wave provides server maintenance and utility resources, such as ERAS (remote access) and EKM services. To my knowledge, no one else is offering these solutions across the whole horizontal trust system.
3. Wave's server support seems designed to bridge the divide between different pieces of equipment. So in time, Wave's servers will support Nokia's and Samsung's cell phones, as well as Dell's and NEC's PCs. And anyone else who appears with equipment in this space.
4. Ultimately, Wave's servers will likely provide trusted applet upload infrastructure for the whole system. Cell phones using an ARM Trustzone platform in an open internet environment look well-suited for the delivery of trusted applets. In the PC space, awk has argued applets will be loaded through Intel's TXT architecture.
AI
