Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

[quasi_smart]

You can't have it both ways......

Posted by: clarity789
In reply to: mastaflash who wrote msg# 101107 Date:2/18/2008 12:35:14 PM
Post #of 101122

Gosh that sounds so good... what value will Megas merge into BCIT?

As for your twisting that Megas did not want a short squeeze? Complete nonsense... and you know it!

Please re-read this PR from Megas - in it he requested exactly that from the NASD

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=7190334

---------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by: clarity789
In reply to: 2late who wrote msg# 100849 Date:2/13/2008 5:28:07 PM
Post #of 101121

Let me try and correct your false assertion that Megas wanted "A FORCED BUY IN to remove a HUGE short position."

Let me show you exactly what Megas said - when he said it - and in his own words... okay?

Here's the link to prove you are wrong - you might not like it, but it is FACTUAL

http://www.primenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=83109

In that PR, Megas talked exclusively about the Carter shares signed by Richard Carter - and the "hundreds of millions of shares" that Carter released into the market

The counterfeits - signed by Thomas Megas - were NOT mentioned. Neither was a SHORT mentioned. Instead, Megas claimed they (the Carter shares) "failed to deliver" what they represented as valid shares of BCIT.

You keep twisting that to mean they were short - they were NOT short, and that is NOT why Megas requested a buy-in.

Megas has never claimed there was a "HUGH short position" as you claimed, and I don't think he would be happy that you are defending him with such nonsense.

Now please - read the PR and accept it for what it says. Especially the last paragraph.