NO QUARTER FOR CORRUPTION (Focussing on The Fed./FRBS)

[jawmoke]

Hard Evidence Of Bush's Crime Of Iraq
(The True But Sickening Story Of Why We Are Really There)
BushCrimes.net UPDATED December 3, 2007

Summary, and Homepage Section Headings:

The 1996 Clean Break Plan for Unprovoked Attacks in Mid-East, The 1999 Bush Connection to the Clean Break Plan, Bush's Implementation of revised Clean Break Plan in 2001, Bush et al's Distortion of Intelligence After 9/11, Absence of WMD Verified by CIA Before Invasion, Bush's Phony Pretext for a War Crime - The Clean Break Plan in Action, The Language of the Law - Criminal Fraud & Murder

This is just a very brief summary of the worst crime in American history. Full details of the hard, eye-witnessed, documented, and fully referenced evidence and proof are presented 2 pages below.

In 1996 three American neocons prepared a mid-east war plan for Israel called Clean Break. Israel did not use this plan. This plan, as later revised by its lead author, Richard Perle, called for an unprovoked attack against Iraq. As any unprovoked attack on another country is by International Treaty a war crime, that revised 1996 plan contained a key provision for a phony pretext for public consumption to cover up that lack of provocation: the false threat of WMD use by Iraq. Under US law such a deliberate false threat that causes any harm to others would by legal definition be felony criminal fraud (A Pretext for War, Bamford, pgs. 258-265).

In 1999 candidate Bush hired the neocons Richard Perle as his mid-east foreign policy advisor and Paul Wolfowitz (the architect of the Iraq war) as his foreign policy advisor. Together they revised the original Clean Break plan to now target Iraq instead of Syria, with the same cover-up provision. This Bush revised plan carefully followed the neocon ideology as outlined in Google, under neo-conservative ideology. You can also find Clean Break there.

In January of 2001, in his very first National Security meeting (7 months before 9/11), president Bush formally adopted key Clean Break provisions as national policy, as witnessed by Colin Powell and Paul O'Neil. Days later he enacted those provisions. A few weeks later he hired all three of Clean Break's authors and Wolfowitz into the top four war policy positions in the government.

In 2002 Bush formed several different groups of necons to develop pro-war propaganda, including the White House Iraq Group (WHIG). This group included all the top propagandists in the GOP. Following the Clean Break Plan they developed and packaged all the intentionally false stories we heard about all the various imminent threats Iraq supposedly posed for America, using its nonexistent WMD (see full eye-witnessed details below in Homepage).

Also in 2002, Bush's influence on Intelligence services to report only pro-war stories led to Tenet's cover-up of the best intelligence feat of the war effort. The CIA's Charlie Allen had sent 30 American relatives of Iraqi WMD scientists to Iraq to find out from them the current status of their WMD programs.

Unanimously, they all reported back that all of these WMD programs had ended by 1992 and all WMD had been destroyed. Allen's report went to Tenet, but Tenet ended Allen's project, ignored his report, and reported these facts only to Bush, if anyone. All of Allen's findings were confirmed after the war.

In March, 2003, Bush ordered the attack on Iraq knowing full well that he had committed felony criminal fraud to start this phony war that he knew would kill at least thousands of innocent civilians.

By willfully and deliberately starting a phony unprovoked war planned years in advance that had only his fabricated neocon ideology as its basis, and knowing full well that thousands of innocent women and children would be slaughtered by his criminal attack, Bush by legal definition committed premeditated murder.

That attack killed 400,000 to 800,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, 75% of them women and children (Lancet: Iraqi Dead May Total 800,000, Intl. Herald Tribune, Oct. 11, 2006). It also eventually killed over 3,900 American GIs, and caused the suicide death of over 14,000 more, and growing at 5,000 more each year (see detail below, and Google for Iraq veterans suicides).

The US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the official voice on the final facts of the matter, later concluded that there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11, that Iraq had no WMD prior to the war, and that all of Bush et al's arguments for going to war were all fabrications.

All of these facts were well known by Bush et al before the attack. In America, federal law defines the knowing telling of lies to congress, in order to gain their unwitting approval to start an unprovoked war that would knowingly kill tens of thousands of unarmed innocent civilians, as criminal fraud and a conspiracy to commit murder.

All of the congresspersons who voted for this phony war enabled Bush's crimes. Some have since repudiated their vote, but most have not. Neither the Justice Department nor Congress has yet begun any criminal investigation of Bush. The news media has yet to publicize the detailed facts of his criminality.

Simple widespread public knowledge of these criminal facts would force criminal investigations, and result in GOP congresspersons fleeing from their support of Bush, his illegal war, and his policies: Immediately ending the validity of his veto threats on legislation, and effectively ending Bush's power as president.

By encouraging new support and funding for wounded GIs, it would also save the lives of over 400 veterans each month who, left untreated, would otherwise commit suicide (Veteran's Administration projects 5,000 GI suicides in 2007, for lack of funding for immediate treatment; within 24 hours).

Documenting Bush's Criminal Actions on Iraq
Based upon documented facts from numerous well known authors and eyewitnesses, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, and a large group of other neocon loyalists (Bush et al) appear to have committed at least 16 federal crimes relative to their unprovoked attack and atrocity on Iraq. If so, their crime on Iraq is the worst crime in American history. All sources, language of laws, and well documented facts are contained within this site. Multiple author, book, and page number references are noted just below, and dozens of source quotes are in this website's Links to Chapters, listed below.

The 1996 Plan to Attack Syria and Iraq, Unprovoked: The Clean Break Plan
In 1996 three American neocons developed, on contract, a strategic plan for the Israeli government. That plan was called A Clean Break. Along with several other actions uniquely related to Israel (for full text see Google for the Clean Break plan), it called for:

the end of US involvement in the Israeli/Palestinian peace process,
adoption of a preemptive foreign policy,
an unprovoked attack on Syria and to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq by force, and
since any such an unprovoked attack would by international treaty be a Crime Against Peace, a war crime, that Clean Break plan included the essential propaganda element of a phony pretext for public consumption to cover up that lack of provocation, such as non-existent threats of WMD, etc, and to provide a phony excuse for what would be, by legal definition, a criminal attack on Syria (later, on Iraq), with the pretext being initially focused on Syria (see Google for definition of War Crimes, A Pretext for War, Bamford, pgs. 258-265).

In other words, the above part 4 of the 1996 Clean Break plan called for the President of the country to willfully and deliberately create a climate of false fear in the public, using criminal fraud threats of a false imminent attack by Syria (later, by Iraq) using chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, to justify his criminal attack on Syria (Iraq) and its innocent civilians. Clean Break was a plan for a war crime.

The authors of that plan also wrote up sample press releases to be issued by the President of the country, warning of the phony imminent danger posed by Syria (later, by Iraq). The lead author of that plan, Richard Perle, "felt that their Clean Break recommendations were so important that he personally hand-carried the report to Netanyahu (then the equivalent of President of Israel). Wisely, Netanyahu rejected this plan" (A Pretext for War, Bamford, pgs. 258-265).

The 1999 Bush Connection to The Neocons and Clean Break
Fast forward three years. In 1999 Bush began his quest for the presidential nomination, and he was personally upset with Hussein because of a failed assassination attempt against his father in Kuwait after the first Gulf war. He hired neocons Rice and Wolfowitz to manage his tutoring of neo-conservative (neocon) foreign policy, and then hired that same Clean Break's Richard Perle to be his advisor on foreign policy (The Price of Loyalty, Suskind, pg. 80).

The other two authors were Douglas Feith and David Wurmser. All of these people were neocons and were later hired by Bush, within weeks after taking office, into the top war policy positions in his administration. After having selected neocons Cheney as his vice president and Rumsfeld as Sec. of Defense, Bush had surrounded himself with and empowered a large group of fanatic neocons to assume control of the nation's new foreign policy.

In the late 1990s the attention of the neocons in their publicly advocated Mid-East war policy became focused on Iraq, and an unprovoked attack on them by the US. Bush's personal quarrel was with Iraq, not Syria. So after many standard staff conversations with Perle about exactly what he had previously planned for the phony pretext regarding Syria, and how he could now do the same for Iraq with its many legal implications, Bush hired Perle as the full time planner and advocate for the US's new neocon Iraq war crime policy.

Since Perle was now working for the US and not Israel, and had already joined with his fellow neocons in calling for an unprovoked attack against Iraq, he changed the prior Clean Break plan to substitute America for Israel and Iraq for Syria. The phony pretext of non-existent WMD originally planned for the unprovoked attack on Syria was changed to target Iraq; an existing US enemy: same planner, same plan, different client, different target.

....article continues

http://www.bushcrimes.net/