InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

Re: puppydotcom post# 132596

Wednesday, 02/13/2008 10:41:01 PM

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:41:01 PM

Post# of 245693
swvc's 5x-Super-Toxic "Preferreds" are 5 times worse than all other toxic 'deals' swvc signs into, Combined, and Forever.

Also, regarding 'hostile takeovers' : 50.1% is way more than
enough, for Any Real company. But, Tom voted himself 80%.
Does anyone know why? Or have a believable guess?
We shorters know why. And, we're not guessing.

And, we don't do 'dd' , by reading only PR's,
full of flowery plans + schedules. Or, by calling and/or
eMailing the exact guy we are trying to verify.
But, most of us really know better than that.
And, very few of us buy Rolex watches from a guy we just met,
wearing an overcoat, in summer, who has as many as you want,
because he says they are all guaranteed, forever.

Still waiting to hear the answer to :
Why does the swvc CEO need 80% of all swvc shares, that may
ever be printed, and/or converted, forever?
It's 'print 1 + pocket 4 more' ,
when 'print 1 + pocket 1.01' is more than enough.
Unless, there is 'the PR plan' , and 'the Real plan' .

One would think that swvc investors would want to know any
real, or at least believable plan, that explains All of the
independently known facts about the 5x-Super-Toxic Preffys.
We shorters are funny that way. Especially near pennys.

Averaging-down is profitable, for shorters, only.