InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252368
Next 10
Followers 90
Posts 17409
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: akasidney86 post# 58846

Monday, 02/11/2008 1:33:22 PM

Monday, February 11, 2008 1:33:22 PM

Post# of 252368
RE: SCLN numbers.

You missed Dew's post where he referenced the latest large study here where the SOC came in at 9%.

Given that the trial is probably running at 11% (w/o dew's unlikely assumption about remaing patients), that gives 9% vs. 13% for the 2 arms.

This is well withen the "noise" error when looking at unblinded data.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.