Friday, February 01, 2008 10:40:56 AM
>>
If you read my post you know i DO know how they were booking these trips. I wanted to GO on one of these trips. I GOT the information, and was a PROSPECT.
Don't assume that since what I say is negative that it has to be objected to. Sometimes the truth IS negative.
YOu say if I do not know to not comment, as it does no good at all. Does that mean if i DO know that i SHOULD comment, as it DOES do good? Actuallly, yes i think so. It shows a truth. And truth is hard to find at times within DPBM. Sharig, even when negative, gives more light on the issue, and that can never be a bad thing. Even if a negative thing.
"I", not some third party, not some friend of a friend, or someone I heard something from, but "I" wanted to go on this executive escape trip. I asked for the information. I recieved it back. I inquired more and tried to arrange my schedule to make it happen. I was the one told that it was booking well and there were a few spots left, so yes I could book it. Now, they will not BE there for this booking. Either they lied to me, or they lied to the ones that did book. Tell me how this is NOT relevant ot not something to share?
I am bullish on a LOT of companies. But, when bad things happen I don't try to put on blinders and say ALL things must be positive. At times, things are good, and at times things are bad. This is a BAD thing, in that either the 2008 funding by these trips is NOT going to happen as we were led to believe, or there are going to be a few people in the DR VERY mad at DPBM and they are people with MONEY that will ACT on their abandonment in a foreign country! (And I believe the first. That there were NO people on the trip. And our 2008 funding is NOT as secure as we HAVE BEEN TOLD. That is MY opinion.)
Don't try to make it out like I can't say something bad becaue I don't know what I am talking about. I talked to them about this trip and tried to be ON it. I know the dates and know they will not be there for those dates!
By the way, I have never once used the words "kool aid drinker" to describe a bull here. But, if you try to not acknowledge true facts from a first person source because you don't want to HEAR it, then that is why others DO use the words kool aid drinker. Be a bull. I'm fine with that. Just don't use the "I already have my opinion. Don't try to confuse me with the facts" approach. Recoginze that sometimes (including this time) this company says things that are later proven to not be true. It is a fct of this company, and if you want to invest in it you need to know that it is aprt of the make up of the company you own. But I still won't call you a kool aid drinker.
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM