InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 1007
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/18/2006

Re: DK 212 post# 128927

Thursday, 01/31/2008 12:20:59 PM

Thursday, January 31, 2008 12:20:59 PM

Post# of 245700
SWVC is taking 6+ months to remodel 1 store...

Usually it takes 2 months, or less. Especially when there is
an oversupply of construction guys, like now, in today's
economy, especially in a depressed region of the U.S.

Unless, the shopkeeper has to save up all the cash to pay
each contractor, before he starts, or buys any materials.

And, when all stores are losing more cash, every day,
then the shopkeeper has to get more loans,
or start selling more brand new shares.

Something is very wrong with this SWVC picture.

If SWVC does not show profits on their next finanshills,
they will have to sign-up for even more toxic CD 'loans'.

And, 'revenues' don't help, if
the more they sell, the more they lose.

And, it certainly does not help
to acquire more money-losing private companies,
with their own 'hidden' toxies.

By the way, there is no way that TS was 'surprised'
to find 'hidden' toxies in the SWVC not-quite-empty shell.

Because, the first thing he did, was to
award himself with an almost identical toxie,
where he always owns 80% of all shares + votes of SWVC,
no matter how much he ever dilutes SWVC.

Via conversions of old + new toxies,
that he blames on 'hidden' stuff, or,
via plain-old massive sub-penny new-share dilution,
that he personally 'manages' as needed.

Let's see how much profit drops to the bottom line
on SWVC's next finanshill. If it shows increasing losses,
watch out below. [Except for shorters. Who say Go.]

Averaging-down is profitable, for shorters, only.